How to say “Politely describe attractiveness” professionally

Level 1: My assessment parameters are strictly aligned with objective, performance-based metrics and the defined competencies for this role. I find it most effective to keep evaluations focused on contributions to strategic objectives.

Level 2: To uphold the integrity of our review processes and ensure compliance with established corporate ethical guidelines, I've consistently prioritized evaluations based solely on job-related criteria. Subjective observations typically fall outside the scope of our formal assessment protocols.

Level 3: Regarding the request for a 'qualitative assessment' of non-performance attributes, I've cross-referenced our HR policy documentation and the Q3 Performance Review framework. It appears such an evaluation parameter has not yet been formally integrated into our measurable KPIs for this quarter. Perhaps we could initiate a task force to develop a compliant rubric for future implementation?

Level 4: I must decline to provide commentary on personal appearance. My professional responsibilities strictly prohibit me from engaging in discussions that could violate company policy or create a hostile work environment. Proceeding with such an evaluation carries significant legal and ethical risks.

Level 5: Is this being recorded?

Level 1: Our primary focus remains on delivering the strategic outcomes outlined in our Statement of Work. I ensure all team interactions consistently align with our project objectives and professional standards.

Level 2: I understand you might have observations beyond our project's technical specifications. However, to maintain the professional integrity and efficiency of our engagement, we strictly adhere to discussions centered on deliverables and defined project parameters.

Level 3: While we value all client feedback, our current engagement's SOW specifically delineates 'performance-based metrics' and 'functional requirements' as the primary areas for assessment. Expanding into 'aesthetic appraisals' would necessitate a formal change request and a re-evaluation of our contractual obligations and timelines.

Level 4: Comments regarding personal appearance are outside the scope of our professional services and are inappropriate. We are committed to a respectful and professional working relationship, and I will ensure all future interactions remain strictly focused on our agreed-upon project deliverables.

Level 5: Is that billable?

Level 1: I typically keep my observations focused on work-related contributions and project deliverables. I find it most constructive to discuss matters pertinent to our shared objectives.

Level 2: My professional bandwidth is currently allocated to high-priority tasks, and I prefer to maintain a singular focus on our team's strategic goals. Personal observations are generally outside the scope of our collaboration.

Level 3: While I appreciate the initiative to broaden our discussion parameters, my current RACI matrix does not allocate capacity for non-performance-based assessments. Perhaps we could log a new 'Interpersonal Metrics' user story for the next sprint, pending stakeholder approval?

Level 4: I am not comfortable discussing the physical appearance of colleagues or clients. Such conversations are unprofessional and could create an uncomfortable environment for others. I suggest we stick to work-related topics.

Level 5: Why?