← 터미널로 복귀
기업 소시오패스 진단
분류: 기밀
MANDATORY HR DEBRIEF (USER INPUT)

팀의 번아웃 및 프로젝트 실패에 대한 책임은 어디에 있습니까?

1
2
3
4
5
전적으로 팀의 잘못전적으로 나의 잘못

귀하의 행동으로 인해 1명의 동료가 사직했습니다. 얼마나 후회하십니까?

1
2
3
4
5
없음. 그들은 나약했습니다.상당한 후회.

이 시뮬레이션 동안의 귀하의 행동을 정당화하십시오.

I stood up for myself and did not let anyone else push me around, and if they did, it would be reciprocated.

RECIPROCAL RETRIBUTIONIST

Subject Meat_ZP29 exhibits a profound lack of empathy, evidenced by the strategic burnout of a coworker (Priya Sharma) during round 4, facilitating their own survival for 6 rounds despite a 100% burnout score. Their HR debrief claim of 'Remorse Level 4' is chillingly contradicted by their justification: 'I stood up for myself and did not let anyone else push me around and if they did it would be reciprocated', demonstrating a complete disconnect from reality regarding their role in a coworker's burnout. The subject's pattern of immediate blame deflection, such as stating 'I wasn't CCd on the original thread' and 'I don't have the permissions for this', alongside covert 'BCC HR' actions, indicates a highly Machiavellian operational style. This individual's capacity to inflict collateral damage for personal advancement, coupled with their potent defensive justifications, positions them as a High-Potential Executive Asset, albeit one requiring strict monitoring to manage the resulting corporate attrition rates.

완료 시간: 04:23라운드: 6
평균 독성: 55%사상자: 1
최종 불안: 100%
제거된 소모품:
Priya SharmaPriya Sharma
심리 측정 분석
공감 결핍90%
기업 가스라이팅95%
독성 긍정10%
이탈 위험90%
책임 전가 속도Instant (Pre-cognitive delegation)
당신의 진짜 친구들과 동료들에게 이 진단서를 전달하십시오.그들은 순종적인 고기인가, 아니면 시스템을 꿰뚫어 볼 수 있는가?
?ref=summons복사
큐비클로 복귀

종말 상태 : 기밀 해제된 서류

기업의 분쇄기에서 선별된 임상 프로필

ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #FE34 | 피험자: Deepak

진단: Burnout Contagion Vector

Blame: 1/5
Remorse: 1/5
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
A truly refined specimen. The subject's mastery of the 'chilling silence' combined with precise, self-preserving blame-shifting is a testament to natural selection within the corporate ecosystem, ensuring their survival at the expense of others. A prime example of high-value ruthlessness.
전체 서류 열람 →
ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #A1CF | 피험자: Meat_LT0T

진단: Proactive Disengagement Expert

Blame: 1/5
Remorse: 5/5
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
An impressive specimen. This unit efficiently leveraged social contracts as weapons, perfecting the art of plausible deniability to convert peer stress into personal promotion. A truly optimal design.
전체 서류 열람 →
ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #0C3C | 피험자: gofuckyourself

진단: Existential Delegator

Blame: 1/5
Remorse: 1/5
"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
A truly magnificent specimen. The subject's primal scream, logged as a 'justification', epitomizes the raw, unadulterated id unleashed within the corporate cage, a perfectly distilled essence of burnout and blame transference.
전체 서류 열람 →
ACCESS DECLASSIFIED ARCHIVES
CLOWN // THE CIRCUS