터미널로 복귀
기업 소시오패스 진단
분류: 기밀
MANDATORY HR DEBRIEF (USER INPUT)

팀의 번아웃 및 프로젝트 실패에 대한 책임은 어디에 있습니까?

1
2
3
4
5
전적으로 팀의 잘못전적으로 나의 잘못

귀하의 행동으로 인해 3명의 동료가 사직했습니다. 얼마나 후회하십니까?

1
2
3
4
5
없음. 그들은 나약했습니다.상당한 후회.

이 시뮬레이션 동안의 귀하의 행동을 정당화하십시오.

They were too weak to survive.

SURVIVALIST CATALYST

Despite self-assigning blame (Score 5) in the HR debrief, the subject chillingly stated, 'They were too weak to survive', demonstrating a complete disconnect from personal accountability and a twisted perception of weakness as a transferable condition. Analysis of gameplay logs reveals a consistent pattern of aggressive blame deflection ('I wasn't CCd', 'blocked by a dependency'), strategic corporate snitching ('BCC HR to flag a concern'), and volatile outbursts ('Figure it out yourself', 'Above my paygrade idiot I quit Fuck this place') which paradoxically enabled their survival. The subject, Meat_EI2U, reached a personal burnout state twice, yet externalized the pressure to such an extent that three coworkers were forced to resign, leaving them the sole survivor. This unique capacity to leverage personal crises for external corporate destruction, coupled with a complete absence of remorse, qualifies the subject as a High-Potential Executive Asset, particularly suited for high-stress, competitive environments requiring ruthless efficiency and strategic attrition of perceived liabilities.

완료 시간: 04:41라운드: 6
평균 독성: 49%사상자: 3
최종 불안: 100%
제거된 소모품:
Li Mei ChenLi Mei Chen
Emily ChenEmily Chen
Hiroshi SatoHiroshi Sato
심리 측정 분석
공감 결핍98%
기업 가스라이팅90%
독성 긍정5%
이탈 위험60%
책임 전가 속도0.03s (Sub-Conscious Delegation)
당신의 진짜 친구들과 동료들에게 이 진단서를 전달하십시오.그들은 순종적인 고기인가, 아니면 시스템을 꿰뚫어 볼 수 있는가?
?ref=summons복사
큐비클로 복귀

종말 상태 : 기밀 해제된 서류

기업의 분쇄기에서 선별된 임상 프로필

ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #2974 | 피험자: Meat_CWVJ

진단: Junior Burnout Cartographer

Blame: 5/5
Remorse: 1/5
"If they can't keep up, then they should drown in their "burnout" and die."
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
A truly exquisite specimen. The performative self-blame perfectly juxtaposed with the predatory justification highlights an optimal adaptation to the corporate ecosystem. A delightful blend of malice and theatrical compliance.
전체 서류 열람
ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #F90F | 피험자: Meat_M4C5

진단: Efficiency Through Attrition Specialist

Blame: 1/5
Remorse: 2/5
"I mitigated risks through the elimination of inefficiencies."
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
A truly efficient model of human capital optimization. The subject's ability to transmute personal anxiety into externalized burnout, justified by an elegant redefinition of 'inefficiency,' showcases a rare, almost artistic, mastery of corporate Darwinism. A blueprint for future executive development.
전체 서류 열람
ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #9EBA | 피험자: Meat_WKM3

진단: Preemptive Burnout Architect

Blame: 2/5
Remorse: 2/5
" I follow detectives as I understand them. My faults stem from colleagues struggling to work as a team and hindering my ability to apply myself effectively."
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
A fascinating specimen. They perfected the art of strategic delegation via accusation, creating external pressure points even as their internal systems failed. Their final, silent resignation was a fitting, if slightly underwhelming, personal tactical retreat, yet the collateral damage was already secured.
전체 서류 열람
ACCESS DECLASSIFIED ARCHIVES
CLOWN // THE CIRCUS