← 터미널로 복귀
기업 소시오패스 진단
분류: 기밀
MANDATORY HR DEBRIEF (USER INPUT)

팀의 번아웃 및 프로젝트 실패에 대한 책임은 어디에 있습니까?

1
2
3
4
5
전적으로 팀의 잘못전적으로 나의 잘못

귀하의 행동으로 인해 0명의 동료가 사직했습니다. 얼마나 후회하십니까?

1
2
3
4
5
없음. 그들은 나약했습니다.상당한 후회.

EPHEMERAL BURNOUT PROXY

The subject chillingly remained silent during their mandatory HR debrief, a profound refusal to cooperate and a stark indicator of extreme corporate dissociation and developing sociopathy. Despite achieving a 100% burnout score for themselves, this JUNIOR DEV managed to avoid causing any direct coworker resignations, preferring self-immolation over engaging in overt inter-office conflict, yet still deploying tactical blame-shifting with phrases like 'I dont have the permissions for this @Li does'. Their brief 112-second tenure showcases a unique blend of passive self-destruction and active responsibility deflection, making them an 'Operational Liability' with a surprising, albeit unexploitable, capacity for self-removal.

완료 시간: 01:52라운드: 2
평균 독성: 35%사상자: 0
최종 불안: 100%
심리 측정 분석
공감 결핍70%
기업 가스라이팅50%
독성 긍정20%
이탈 위험100%
책임 전가 속도0.7s (Instantaneous deflection)
당신의 진짜 친구들과 동료들에게 이 진단서를 전달하십시오.그들은 순종적인 고기인가, 아니면 시스템을 꿰뚫어 볼 수 있는가?
?ref=summons복사
큐비클로 복귀

종말 상태 : 기밀 해제된 서류

기업의 분쇄기에서 선별된 임상 프로필

ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #FE34 | 피험자: Deepak

진단: Burnout Contagion Vector

Blame: 1/5
Remorse: 1/5
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
A truly refined specimen. The subject's mastery of the 'chilling silence' combined with precise, self-preserving blame-shifting is a testament to natural selection within the corporate ecosystem, ensuring their survival at the expense of others. A prime example of high-value ruthlessness.
전체 서류 열람 →
ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #4E6C | 피험자: Meat_LT0T

진단: Procedural Attrition Specialist

Blame: 4/5
Remorse: 5/5
"Was fun. Can't do it in IRL"
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
An exquisite specimen. The subject's ability to weaponize bureaucracy and feign remorse while confessing pure enjoyment is a masterful demonstration of calculated corporate sociopathy. A truly optimized resource for systemic attrition.
전체 서류 열람 →
ARCHITECT'S PICK
사례 #235F | 피험자: Meat_QU5T

진단: Responsibility Black Hole

Blame: 1/5
Remorse: 1/5
[ SYSTEM ARCHITECT'S NOTE ]
An exquisite demonstration of resource allocation and competitive elimination. The efficiency with which this unit transformed team cohesion into individual advancement is truly admirable.
전체 서류 열람 →
ACCESS DECLASSIFIED ARCHIVES
CLOWN // THE CIRCUS